1,5 milhões de classificações
277 mil classificações

Viu? É para isso mesmo que o app é perfeito.

Parece ótimo. Ahhh, não quero não!
babe-ylon5
shatnerwilliams

U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC - 170
Constitution-class

Fonte: shatnerwilliams

Outras coisas que você pode gostar

sudata7
sleepymccoy

In 2249, Michael joined Starfleet [ref]

In 2249, Spock joined Starfleet  [ref]

By 2254 Spock was assigned to the U.S.S. Enterprise under Pike  [ref]

2256 Star Trek Discovery takes place  [ref]

2269–2270 Star Trek TOS takes place  [ref]

In the Star Trek episode, Journey to Babel, Sarek is on the ship. Kirk voices support of Spock’s choices and notes that he has a personal friendship with Spock to his mother Amanda, who appreciates the sentiment but also warns that the estrangement between father and son may be permanent, since it has been 18 years  [ref]

So, taking 18 years off the canon dates of TOS, Sarek hasn’t spoken to Spock since 2251 or 2252, a couple of years since Spock started with Starfleet and likely around the time he graduated and began working on a ship. Despite literally walking one child onto a star ship and arranging her stay there, Sarek was entirely disapproving to the point of ostracisation about his other child’s choice to work within the fleet. 

When Michael called Sarek for advice on how to handle the Klingons (a call he took and advice he freely gave) he was not speaking to Spock. 

My point here isn’t to say that Sarek is inherently evil or that no one can like him or any such shit, it’s to point out that the plot of Discovery does not affect how Sarek treats Spock, because Sarek was treating Spock awfully the whole damn time. Sarek treats his children with double (even triple, if we consider Sybok) standards and it’s awful, it’s a form of abuse and I personally can’t stand it and nothing Discovery does is gonna make me like Sarek, cos every good thing he does for Michael is another shitty thing he does to Spock. 

I’m glad Michael’s relationship with Sarek is better than Spock’s is, she deserves every bit of good she can get and her life has been harsh enough without Sarek throwing a needless amount of punishment her way, but it still doesn’t make Sarek a better person or parent. 

Having said all that, he is a great character, he’s just a great bad guy in my opinion. He’s complicated and nasty and manipulative and I like his scenes, I just don’t like the character. 

enterprisetrampstamp

I 100% agree.


In this particular case, I’ve been reading the double standard as a matter of “well, sure, Starfleet’s good enough for my ward, just not my son” which kinda exposes the fact that his relationship with michael, no matter how much “healthier” it seems than his one with spock, still pretty much sucks

sudata7

Reblogging for the comments but also because I’m grateful someone worked out the timeline in relation to Spock and Michael. Also, rather than Discovery messing up canon as I’ve seen people complain on other blogs, perhaps it explains why Spock didn’t rise above Sarek snubbing him over joining Starfleet and try to reconcile, i.e. the whole thing of Sarek backing Michael all the way and even finding her a ship placement, while at the same exact time practically disowning Spock over joining Starfleet.

Fonte: sleepymccoy
julian-bashir-protection-squad
straight-as-a-curly-fry

My favourite fact about Star Trek TOS is that, because automatic doors weren’t invented yet, the ‘automatic doors’ in TOS were really just some guy yanking a rope and pulley system to make them slide open. Problem was the person was far enough away that they couldn’t see when exactly the doors needed to be open, and relied on a signal from somebody just off set. The actors, however, had to act as if they were 100% confident the doors were going to open at the exact time and moment despite the fact that they occasionally did not which lead to multiple occasions in which the actors walked directly into the doors while they were opening. 

dubiousculturalartifact

A. it’s so surreal to think of the modern technology like automatic doors, that we just take for granted while watching Star Trek. But they were legitimately part of the futuristic elements of the show to the viewers at the time. It’s interesting to consider how these elements may have influenced those future inventions, as in the case with other tech on the show like the commmunicators. Also how differing social/historical contexts influences the reception of a work. What elements in our contemporary science fiction will seem commonplace or even hopelessly dated, to societies of the future? How will what we envision wind up shaping those societies, and what is the responsibility of us to…

B. nah anyway someone tell me there’s footage of Shatner doing this

ploppythespaceship

Here’s a montage of several bloopers where people have problems with the doors. My personal favorite is Michael Dorn walking directly into the turbolift door and Patrick Stewart just smiles because it has to happen all the time.

old-type-40

One of the assistant directors for DS9 told a story for the upcoming documentary about how he goofed in signaling for a door to be closed after the actors walked through it and it clipped Terry Farrell’s backside. So as she passed him to continue the scene, she flipped him off while keeping her hand down out of view of the camera.

Fonte: straight-as-a-curly-fry
dayless-wanderer

List of things that made me cry in STB

transhobanwashburne

  • The camera roving over Yorktown with the music playing and how that was the very heart of Star Trek right there
  • How Sulu’s face lit up when he saw his family
  • When the Vulcans gave Spock the bad news about Spock Prime
  • When the Enterprise blew up
  • When Spock found Spock Prime’s photograph and the TOS theme started playing
  • When everybody celebrated Kirk’s birthday
  • The “Space, the Final Frontier” speech
  • In loving memory of Leonard Nimoy
  • For Anton
Fonte: transhobanwashburne
supernovacoffee
  • Someone: why is startrek pandering to sjws now!!
  • Me entering the room with a glass fresh ice tea: every series in the star trek franchise has embraced radically progressive ideas. its simply that over time, mainstream ideals began to match theirs, until these radical ideas were nothing more than the standard. Every series from TOS to Enterprise has been met with conservative backlash and years from now, the new generation will look back at discovery and think how anyone could have possibly seen it as progressive, if not a little out-dated, the same way we look back at TOS.
  • Me, finishing my ice tea and leaving the room, but i look back and stare directly into the camera: this struggle between old vs. new transcends all barriers and is rooted in the very core of human nature. Shifting new to be our old is part of progress, it is a cycle non of us can escape.
Abrir no app Mostrar mais